USPTO serial 78182557
PSEUDO VTA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SLOAN, CYNTHIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PSEUDO VTA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Sa-ha ku, Pusan, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Seong-Kun Oh, Esq.
SEONG- KUN OH ESQ JACKSON & CO., LLP6114 LA SALLE AVE #507OAKLAND CA, 94611 2802U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | amplifier; circuit for amplifier | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |