Drawing for GOODNESS GROWN TO A HIGHER STANDARD

USPTO serial 78182838

GOODNESS GROWN TO A HIGHER STANDARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GOODNESS GROWN TO A HIGHER STANDARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas L. Lockhart

THOMAS L LOCKHART VARNUM, RIDDERING, SCHMIDT & HOWLETT LLP333 BRG ST NWGRAND RAPIDS MI, 49504U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005NUTRITIONALLY FORTIFIED BEVERAGESACTIVE—
016PAPER PRODUCTS, NAMELY, PAPER BAGS AND PAPER BOXESACTIVE—
021BAKING DISHES, BABY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH TUBS AND TRAINING POTS AND PET PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FEEDING DISHES, PET CAGES AND PET BRUSHESACTIVE—
029FRUIT BASED SNACKS; SOUPS; DAIRY PRODUCTS, NAMELY, DAIRY BASED DIPS; PRODUCE, NAMELY, DRIED FRUITS; MEAT, NAMELY LUNCHEON MEATS; POULTRY; AND FROZEN ENTREES, NAMELY, PREPARED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLESACTIVE—
030CEREAL BASED SNACKS, SPICES, NATURAL SWEETENERSACTIVE—
031FRESH AND RAW HERBSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 30, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 3, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 26, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance