USPTO serial 78182902
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Walker
PATRICIA A WALKER WALKER & JOCKE231 S BROADWAYMEDINA OH, 44256U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF CHECK CASHING, DEFERRED DEPOSITS, FINANCIAL OVERDRAFT PROTECTION AND SHORT-TERM CONSUMER LOANS | ACTIVE | Nov 8, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 30, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 31, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |