Drawing for URGENTCASH

USPTO serial 78182902

URGENTCASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with URGENTCASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia A. Walker

PATRICIA A WALKER WALKER & JOCKE231 S BROADWAYMEDINA OH, 44256U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF CHECK CASHING, DEFERRED DEPOSITS, FINANCIAL OVERDRAFT PROTECTION AND SHORT-TERM CONSUMER LOANSACTIVENov 8, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 8, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 6, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 8, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 18, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 18, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 25, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 31, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 30, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 16, 2003AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 29, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 29, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2003EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance