USPTO serial 78183370
MLB TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MLB TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather L. Jensen
HEATHER L JENSEN COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN PC1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, PRE-RECORDED VIDEOTAPES, PRE-RECORDED VIDEODISCS, PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS, PRE-RECORDED AUDIO DISCS, AND PRE-RECORDED AUDIO TAPES RELATING TO BASEBALL; VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES; VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME DISCS; VIDEO AND COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES; VIDEO AND ELECTRONIC GAME PROGRAMS FOR USE WITH HAND HELD GAME UNITS, COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS AND COMPUTER GAME PROGRAMS DOWNLOADABLE FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK IN THE FIELD OF BASEBALL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named MLB TV
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |