USPTO serial 78183381
MLB TV THE BASEBALL CHANNEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MLB TV THE BASEBALL CHANNEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heather L. Jensen
Heather L. Jensen COWAN LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.1133 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, BASEBALL GAMES, COMPETITIONS AND EXHIBITIONS RENDERED LIVE, THROUGH BROADCAST MEDIA INCLUDING TELEVISION AND RADIO AND VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR A COMMERCIAL ON-LINE SERVICE; PROVIDING, PRODUCING AND DISTRIBUTING PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS IN THE NATURE OF BASEBALL GAMES, COMPETITIONS AND EXHIBITIONS AND PROVIDING INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, ALL THROUGH BROADCAST MEDIA INCLUDING TELEVISION AND RADIO AND VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK OR A COMMERCIAL ON-LINE SERVICE; EDUCATION SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF BASEBALL SKILLS INSTRUCTION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named MLB TV THE BASEBALL CHANNEL
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2004 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |