USPTO serial 78183523
PURESENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3032771Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 20, 2005
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PURESENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Point Richmond, CA
Point Richmond, CA
Point Richmond, CA
OAKLAND, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific sensor and communication instruments used in detecting, analyzing, indicating and reporting on the likelihood of real and potential contaminants introduced intentionally or unintentionally into natural resources such as water, air and soil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
| 042 | PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF ON-LINE NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE USED TO COLLECT DATA AND INFORMATION FROM MULTIPLE DATA SOURCES, ANALYZE THIS DATA AND INFORMATION, PERFORM REPORTING, ALERTING AND COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ALL OF WHICH SUPPORT CONTINUOUS SURVEILLANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND THE LIKELIHOOD OF REAL AND POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS INTRODUCED INTENTIONALLY OR UNINTENTIONALLY; DATA AUTOMATION AND COLLECTION SERVICE, AND DATABASE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE, USING PROPRIETARY SCIENTIFIC SOFTWARE, TO EVALUATE, ANALYZE AND COLLECT SERVICE DATA AND INFORMATION FROM MULTIPLE DATA SOURCES, ANALYZE THIS DATA AND INFORMATION, PERFORM REPORTING, ALERTING AND COMMUNICATION FUNCTIONS ALL OF WHICH SUPPORT CONTINUOUS SURVEILLANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES AND THE LIKELIHOOD OF REAL AND POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS INTRODUCED INTENTIONALLY OR UNINTENTIONALLY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Buxton, Craig Paul
- Other trademarks owned by Buxton, Craig Paul
- Other trademarks owned by Buxton, Craig Paul
- Other trademarks owned by PURESENSE ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PURESENSE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 23, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 24, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |