USPTO serial 78183590
COMPACT-PANEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 5, 2004
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COMPACT-PANEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
DE-35745 Herborn, DE
DE-35745 Herborn, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas H. Pauley
Douglas H. Pauley PAULEY PETERSEN & ERICKSON2800 WEST HIGGINS ROAD, SUITE 365HOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60169UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | switchgear cabinets for industrial use composed of racks, housings, desks and brackets, for use in housing electronics, computers, interactive terminal systems and data transmission systems, the cabinets being air-conditioned, earthquake-proof, vandalism-proof and explosion-proof, and featuring carriers with electronic circuits for plug-in sub-assemblies, namely, plug-in cards, bus bars, and bus boards; data processors; computers; and computer keyboards | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 28, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | โ |
| Oct 20, 2009 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 18, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | โ |
| Oct 14, 2009 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | โ |
| Oct 5, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | โ |
| Aug 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | โ |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | โ |
| Jun 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | โ |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| May 17, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | โ |
| May 12, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | โ |
| Apr 30, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | โ |
| Apr 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | โ |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | โ | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | โ |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | โ |