USPTO serial 78183594
UTOPIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UTOPIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip M. Ballif
PHILIP M BALLIF JONES VARGAS3773 HOWARD HUGHES PKWY THIRD FL SLAS VEGAS NV, 89109U.S. ARMYGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |