USPTO serial 78183629
JORIANNE "THE COFFEE PYSCHIC"
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JORIANNE "THE COFFEE PYSCHIC"?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Tinley Park, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John A. Krupa
JOHN A KRUPA LAW OFFICES OF JOHN A. KRUPA64 ORLAND SQ DR STE 316ORLAND PARK IL, 60462U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | 1) personal appearances on television to conduct specialized psychic readings, 2)personal appearances on radio to conduct specialized psychic readings, 3) regular, continuing television shows relating to specialized psychic readings, 4)regular, continuing radio shows relating to specialized psychic readings, 5) personal acts providing group seances, 6) personal acts providing personal, specialized psychic readings | ACTIVE | Feb 16, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |