USPTO serial 78183734
U CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with U CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AUBURN HILLS, MI
AUBURN HILLS, MI
AUBURN HILLS, MI
AUBURN HILLS, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | PROVIDING ROADSIDE EMERGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY REMOTE DOOR UNLOCK, THROUGH AN INTEGRATED, IN-VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | NAVIGATION SERVICES, NAMELY, VOICE ROUTING AND LOCATION ASSISTANCE THROUGH AN INTEGRATED, IN-VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | PROVIDING SAFETY SERVICES, NAMELY, THEFT DETECTION AND NOTIFICATION, STOLEN VEHICLE TRACKING, AND AUTOMATIC NOTIFICATION OF AIRBAG DEPLOYMENT THROUGH AN INTEGRATED, IN-VEHICLE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DAIMLERCHRYSLER COMPANY LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CHRYSLER LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named U CONNECT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 6, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 9, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 24, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 16, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |