USPTO serial 78183912
ALLDRER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALLDRER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle W. Rost
KYLE W ROST LEWIS & ROST5490 AUTUMN CTGREENWOOD VILLAGE CO, 80111 3417U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Magnetic coded cards for use in business transactions; magnetically encoded debit cards; magnetically encoded prepaid purchase cards for allowing users to transfer financial value on-line via retail computer networks; magnetic coded cards for enabling users to transfer value by electronic cash transactions; magnetically encoded cards for allowing users to transfer financial value from stored value accounts in an electronic environment; and magnetically encoded cards for allowing users to transfer financial value by investment fund transfer | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2006 |
| 016 | Non-magnetic coded cards for use in business transactions; non-magnetically encoded debit cards; non-magnetically encoded prepaid purchase cards for allowing users to transfer financial value on-line via retail computer networks; non-magnetic coded cards for enabling users to transfer value by electronic cash transactions; non-magnetically encoded cards for allowing users to transfer financial value from stored value accounts in an electronic environment; and non-magnetically encoded cards for allowing users to transfer financial value by investment fund transfer | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |