USPTO serial 78184151
ARTECHNIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2005
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ARTECHNIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Buckingham, PA
Buckingham, PA
Buckingham, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas J. Ryder
DOUGLAS J RYDER RYDER IP LAW, PC3669 CONCORD RDDOYLESTOWN, PA 18901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design, development, installation, and maintenance of computer software, e-commerce applications and web sites for others; Design and development of computer hardware; Computer services, namely, managing web sites for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |