USPTO serial 78184311
IRWIN GUARANTEED SINCE 1885
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3450732Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 17, 2008
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IRWIN GUARANTEED SINCE 1885?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gabriel Haboubi
Gabriel Haboubi Irwin Industrial Tool Company701 East Joppa RoadPatent Dept., TW199Towson, MD 21286Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | POWER TOOL ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, HOLE-ENLARGING BITS, CARBIDE HOLE CUTTERS, AUGER BITS, DRILL BITS, STEP DRILL BITS, INSERT BITS, FORSTNER BITS, HIGH-SPEED TWIST DRILL BITS, DRYWALL CUT-OUT BITS, FLAT BITS, WOOD-BORING BITS, METAL BORING BITS, INSTALLER BITS, ROUTER BITS, MASONRY BITS, ROTO-PERCUSSION DRILL BITS, UNIVERSAL DRILL BITS, DRILL BIT CASES, MORTAR RAKES, MASONRY CHISELS, CIRCULAR SAW BLADES, RECIPROCATING SAW BLADES, BAND SAW BLADES, SEGMENTED DIAMOND SAW BLADES, JIGSAW BLADES, SCREW EXTRACTORS, FASTENER DRIVE TOOLS, NUTSETTERS/HOLDERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 4, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named IRWIN GUARANTEED SINCE 1885
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 24, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 17, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 9, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 29, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 16, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |