USPTO serial 78184679
AUSSIE RULES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AUSSIE RULES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dana Breitman
DANA BREITMAN FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK NY, 10017U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic publications, namely, magazines and newsletters recorded on microfilm, microfiche, CD-ROM, and DVD covering lifestyle and business opportunities and decisions; pre-recorded instructional videos in the field of golf | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | books relating to fitness, exercise, nutrition, health, lifestyle, and business; lifestyle magazines and newsletters covering lifestyle and business opportunities and decisions | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | boating, fishing, and watersports apparel, namely, pants, jackets, foul weather jackets, vests, gloves, scarves, shirts, shorts, sweaters, windshirts, hats, footwear, socks, drysuits, hats, wetsuits, swimsuits | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computer services, namely, providing information via a website featuring business and lifestyle marketing information | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Production of television programs and motion picture films; entertainment services rendered through the medium of television in the nature of a continuing variety show, entertainment services, namely, public appearances by a sports celebrity; computer services, namely, providing information via a website featuring fitness and lifestyle | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | computer services, namely, providing information via a website featuring nutrition and health | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Great White Shark Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Great White Shark Enterprises, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named AUSSIE RULES
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 1, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 15, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 8, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 19, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2004 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |