Drawing for INFRALERT

USPTO serial 78185605

INFRALERT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPRUILL, DARRYL M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INFRALERT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

P. Scott Maclean

P SCOTT MACLEAN CASSAN MACLEAN307 GILMOUR STOTTAWA, ON K2P 0P7CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Safety testing for others, of brakes, bearings and tires of commercial roadway vehicles, and of brakes and bearings of commercial rail vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 8, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 8, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 12, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 27, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Apr 24, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 13, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Oct 13, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 13, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 7, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 3, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 30, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 26, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2003GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 28, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance