USPTO serial 78185605
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Mississippi Mills, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
P. Scott Maclean
P SCOTT MACLEAN CASSAN MACLEAN307 GILMOUR STOTTAWA, ON K2P 0P7CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Safety testing for others, of brakes, bearings and tires of commercial roadway vehicles, and of brakes and bearings of commercial rail vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 7, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |