Drawing for ADVANCED SHAFT DYNAMICS

USPTO serial 78186109

ADVANCED SHAFT DYNAMICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANCED SHAFT DYNAMICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHARLES N. QUINN

CHARLES N QUINN FOX, ROTHSCHILD, O'BRIEN & FRANKEL, LLP2000 MARKET ST 10TH FLPHILADELPHIA PA, 19103U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042ANALYSIS OF TUBES AND SHAFTS TO DETERMINE STATIC AND DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS, FOR SPORTING AND RECREATIONAL USES, NAMELY, GOLF AND FISHINGACTIVEApr 21, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 20, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 14, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 14, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 10, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 2, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 1, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 30, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 27, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance