USPTO serial 78186109
ADVANCED SHAFT DYNAMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANCED SHAFT DYNAMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
The Woodlands, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHARLES N. QUINN
CHARLES N QUINN FOX, ROTHSCHILD, O'BRIEN & FRANKEL, LLP2000 MARKET ST 10TH FLPHILADELPHIA PA, 19103U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | ANALYSIS OF TUBES AND SHAFTS TO DETERMINE STATIC AND DYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS, FOR SPORTING AND RECREATIONAL USES, NAMELY, GOLF AND FISHING | ACTIVE | Apr 21, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |