Drawing for DERMALITE

USPTO serial 78186213

DERMALITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DERMALITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Myron Cohen

MYRON COHEN COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK NY, 10176U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005MEDICAL LIGHT ACTIVATED AND LIGHT MODIFYING SUBSTANCES USEFUL TN PHOTO DYNAMIC THERAPY, NAMELY, PHOTOFRIN, 5-AMINOLEVULANACID, HEMATOPORPHYRIN, VERTEPORFIN, CHLORTNS, PHTHALDODYANJNES,PHENOTHIAZINE, BENZOPORPHYRTN-DERIVATIVE MONO ACID-A (A TMPn), L-PHENYLALANIN AND PLENOSOLACTIVE—
010MEDICAL APPARATUS FOR TREATING DERMATOLOGICAL DISEASES AND CONDITIONS, INFLAMMATORY DISEASES AND CONDITIONS, AND LONG TERM CHRONIC DISEASES AND CONDITIONS BY PHOTO DYNAMIC THERAPY,NAMELY, MEDICAL STIMULATION DEVICES HAVING A LASER AND/OR SEMICONDUCTOR DIODES FOR EMITTING LIGHT RADIATION TO ACTIVATE LIGHT-ACTIVATABLE SUBSTANCES ABSORBED INTO TISSUE AND AN ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE RADIATOR FOR CONCURRENTLY EMITTING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION ONTO THE TISSUEACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 25, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 17, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2004EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Aug 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 10, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance