Drawing for RUN LIGHTNING

USPTO serial 78186646

RUN LIGHTNING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RUN LIGHTNING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Douglas T. Johnson

Douglas T. Johnson MILLER & MARTIN PLLC1000 Volunteer Building832 Georgia AvenueCHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer game software; video game software; computer and video game discs and tapes; computer and video game carrying and storage cases, computer and video game accessory carrying and storage cases, hand-held steering wheels for playing computer and video games, hand-held controllers for playing computer and video games, hand-held racing wheels for playing computer and video games, computer and video game cartridges, computer and video game cassettes, computer and video game discs, computer and video game equipment containing memory devices, namely discs, and video game interactive hand held remote controls for paying electronic computer and video games, namely, goggles that provide 3D and multi-dimensional effects and game control functions, helmets that provide 3D and multi-dimensional effects and game control functions, gun shaped video game controllers, foot, hand and voice activated video game controllers and wireless video game controllers; video game accessories, namely, memory cards, computer and video game systems, comprised of video game cartridges, video game machines for use with television, computer and video game surround sound speaker systems, comprised of audio speakers and audio speaker enclosures and headphones for playing computer and video gamesACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 29, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 29, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 29, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
May 29, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
May 29, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 29, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Nov 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 29, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
May 29, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
May 29, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 16, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Nov 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 22, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
May 22, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
May 22, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 29, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 17, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999โ€”
Aug 17, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999โ€”
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Jan 24, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999โ€”
Oct 1, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVEDโ€”
Sep 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Jul 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Jul 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Jul 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jul 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Dec 30, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Nov 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
May 13, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance