Drawing for SANSUI

USPTO serial 78186787

SANSUI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SANSUI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence N. Ginsberg

LAWRENCE N GINSBERG LAWRENCE N GINSBERG21 SAN ANTONIONEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660-9112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Receivers; amplifiers; tuners; antennas; audio timers; pick ups; audio racks; wireless communication apparatus, namely, wireless transmitters; pulse code modulating processors;sound processors; graphic equalizers; colour video processors; sound and video processors;character generators; cables; joining units; transformers; encoders and decoders; magnetic tapes; insulating plates; stabilizers; power supplies; alternating current adapters; signal processors; programmers for synthesizer modules; analogue and digital sound modifiers; tape recorders; record players; speakers; recorded disk players; video compact disc players; digital video disc players/recorders; headphones; television receivers; colour televisions; liquid crystal display televisions; plasma televisions; projection televisions; digital plasma displays; liquid crystal display television monitors; liquid crystal display computer monitors; cathode ray tube computer monitors; projectors; video cameras; digital video disc changer; cassette deck; videocassette recorder/video cassette player; and parts and fittings thereforABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 22, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jul 14, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 14, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 15, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 13, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 24, 200344DDSEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED—
Nov 24, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 24, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance