USPTO serial 78187096
AXEUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3522393Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 21, 2008
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AXEUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Carlsbad, CA
Carlsbad, CA
Carlsbad, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian M. Daucher
Brian M. Daucher Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPFourth Floor650 Town Center DriveCosta Mesa, CA 92626Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and software system for facilitating business transactions, namely, electronic and non-electronic cash registers, time clocks, automated teller machines and point-of-sale terminals for use in dispensing cash and non-cash items, depositing of funds, payments of checks, and consummating a variety of electronic transfers of funds; calculating machines; data processing equipment, namely, data processors and computers; magnetic encoded cards; magnetic identity cards; magnetic data carriers containing recorded information and data related to electronic payments; computer software for the management of scannable product files and data; namely, file maintenance and pricing software for cash registers; computer software for use in cash registers, inventory management, and accounting, computer software utilities, computer software for text processing; computer software providing interfaces to a variety of point-of-sale devices for automatically transferring sales data from the point-of-sale to a central computer, for generating reports, for sending PLUs, UPCs, departments and prices to cash registers, and for monitoring sales, purchase and inventory, for use in automating a store and the store manager's daily activities | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 1999 |
| 035 | Payroll services, namely, payroll preparation services, payroll processing services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 22, 2004 |
| 036 | Payroll tax debiting services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 22, 2004 |
| 038 | Electronic transmission of banking and financial information, communications by telephone by reception or by emission, by voice response and by electronic means; electronic transmission of secured messages and images by computer terminals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 8, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Axeus, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Axeus, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Axeus, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named AXEUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 6, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |