USPTO serial 78187441
BABY SUPERSTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ENGEL, MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BABY SUPERSTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Upper Saddle River, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joshua S. Broitman
JOSHUA S BROITMAN OSTRAGER CHONG FLAHERTY & BROITMAN PC250 PARK AVE STE 825NEW YORK, NY 10177-0899UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | GAMES, TOYS AND PLAYTHINGS; NAMELY, LEARNING GAMES, NAMELY BOARD GAMES, PULL TOYS, PUSH TOYS, BABY TEETHING TOYS, BABY RATTLES, BABY RAFFLES INCORPORATING TEETHING RINGS, PLUSH TOYS, STACKING TOYS, SHAPE AND SORTING TOYS, JIGSAW PUZZLES, MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES, PEG PUZZLES, ROCKING HORSES, ROCKING TOYS, JACK-IN-THE-BOX TOYS, TOY MOBILES, PIFLATAS, DOLLS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFORE, DOLL HOUSES, PUPPETS, RUBBER ACTION BALLS, PLAYGROUND BALLS, PLASTIC BASEBALLS, BEACH BALLS, PERSONAL EXERCISE MATS, PLAY MATS FOR CRAWLING AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT, TOY FIGURES, TOY TEA SETS, TOY BICYCLES, TOY CARS, WIND-UP TOYS, MUSICAL TOYS, CHILDREN'S ACTIVITY TABLES CONTAINING MANIPULATIVE TOYS, CHILDREN'S PLAY COSMETICS, CHILDREN'S WIRE CONSTRUCTION TOYS AND CHILDREN'S ART ACTIVITY TOYS, ELECTRONIC EDUCATIONAL GAME MACHINES FOR CHILDREN, BATH TOYS, BENDABLE TOYS, CONSTRUCTION TOYS, CRIB TOYS, DRAWING TOYS, ELECTRIC ACTION TOYS, FANTASY CHARACTER TOYS, INFANT DEVELOPMENT TOYS, INFLATABLE BATH TOYS, INFLATABLE RIDE-ON TOYS, MECHANICAL ACTION TOYS, MECHANICAL TOYS, MUSICAL TOYS, PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS, PLAY MATS CONTAINING INFANT TOYS, PLASTIC CHARACTER TOYS, POP UP TOYS, POSITIONABLE TOY FIGURES, RADIO CONTROLLED TOY VEHICLES, RIDE-ON TOYS, RUBBER CHARACTER TOYS, SANDBOX TOYS, SQUEEZABLE SQUEAKING TOYS, SQUEEZE TOYS, STUFFED TOY ANIMALS, TOY AIRPLANES, TOY ANIMALS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFORE, TOY BAKEWARE AND COOKWARE, TOY BUILDING BLOCKS | ACTIVE | May 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |