USPTO serial 78187751
BIOPLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIOPLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Perry J. Viscounty
PERRY J VISCOUNTY LATHAM & WATKINS650 TOWN CTR DR STE 2000COSTA MESA CA, 92626U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Resorbable synthetic spinal implant. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 8, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |