USPTO serial 78187842
GAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEE, DEBRA ANN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEIRDRE STANLEY
DEIRDRE STANLEY THE THOMSON CORPORATIONONE STATION PLSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Prerecorded CD-ROMs, pre-recorded audio cassettes and pre-recorded video tapes featuring educational instruction in the subjects of math, social studies and language arts | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed publications, namely, books on the subjects of math, social studies and language arts; dictionaries, atlases, printed teachers' guides and aids, posters, promotional materials, namely, catalogues and brochures in the field of education | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 24, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |