Drawing for VISIOWAVE DYNAMIC CODING

USPTO serial 78188095

VISIOWAVE DYNAMIC CODING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3078424Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 11, 2006
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with VISIOWAVE DYNAMIC CODING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Meg Campbell

MEG CAMPBELL GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY3135 EASTON TPKEFAIRFIELD, CT 06828UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, digital video compression and decompression software for digital networking applicationsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Jul 19, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 19, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 11, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 15, 2006DP1B1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION—
Jan 13, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Jan 13, 2006D1BRTEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 18, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 18, 2005OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Nov 23, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jun 14, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 11, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 8, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 5, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance