USPTO serial 78188377
PERV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | BICYCLE AND STRUCTURAL PARTS THEREOF, NAMELY, SADDLES, SEAT POSTS, SEAT POST CLAMPS, FRAMES, BICYCLE FORKS, FRONT FORK SUSPENSIONS, BICYCLE BRAKES, HANDLE BARS, HANDLE BAR STEMS, HANDLE BAR GRIPS, MUD GUARDS, HUB SETS, BICYCLE WHEELS AND RIMS AND SPOKES FOR BICYCLE WHEELS, BICYCLE TIRES, BICYCLE PEDALS, BOTTOM BRACKETS, HEAD SETS, CRANK ARMS, BICYCLE REARVIEW MIRRORS, REAR SUSPENSIONS AND SHOCK ABSORBERS, AND CHAINS; MOTORIZED SCOOTERS; ELECTRIC BICYCLES AND PARTS THEREOF NAMELY REARVIEW MIRRORS, BRAKES, TIRES, HANDLE BARS, HANDLE BAR GRIPS, REAR SHOCK ABSORBERS, FRONT FORK SUSPENSIONS, SADDLES, CHAINS, SPROCKETS, BICYCLE RIMS, AND SPOKES | ACTIVE | Apr 22, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 28, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |