USPTO serial 78188727
KERBMATE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3011945Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 2005
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KERBMATE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
QUEENSLAND 4074, AU
Mt Ommaney Qld, AU
Mt Ommaney Qld, AU
Mt Ommaney Qld, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James H. Walters
James H. Walters patenttm.usPO Box 82788PORTLAND, OR 97282-0788UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Power operated tools, namely, lawn and garden edgers and concrete landscaping edgers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALL KERB MACHINERY PTY LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by Edgetec International Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Edgetec International Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks owned by Edgetec International Pty Ltd
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Similar marks named KERBMATE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 19, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 19, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 27, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |