CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BIN 49

USPTO serial 78188858

BIN 49

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3152734Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 10, 2006
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BIN 49?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Leonardo

Mark S. Leonardo Brown Rudnick LLPOne Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
032Wine making kits consisting primarily of fruit juice or fruit juice concentrates and chemical additives, and which may contain sulphur dioxide, liquid invert sugar, diammonium phosphate, citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, bentonite, potassium sorbate, yeast, potassium metabisulphite, oak extract, oak chips, herbs, elderflowers, elderberries, tannin, sodium benzoate, glucose, isinglass, chitosan, gelatin, kieselsol, labelsSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 17, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Sep 17, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 9, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 30, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 30, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 31, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 10, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 27, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 19, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 8, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 30, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance