USPTO serial 78188895
LEGACY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 13, 2006
- Examiner
- GENOVESE, CARRIE A
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEGACY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vineco International Products Ltd.
St. Catharines, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Vineco International Products Ltd.
Vineco International Products Ltd.
St. Catharines, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Vineco International Products Ltd.
Vineco International Products Ltd.
St. Catharines, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Vineco International Products Ltd.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOSEPH H. GOLANT
JOSEPH H GOLANT JONES DAY77 W WACKER STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601-1692UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine making kits consisting primarily of fruit juice or fruit juice concentrates and chemical additives, and which may contain sulphur dioxide, liquid invert sugar, diammonium phosphate, citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, bentonite, potassium sorbate, yeast, potassium metabisulphite, oak extract, oak chips, herbs, elderflowers, elderberries, tannin, sodium benzoate, glucose, isinglass, chitosan, gelatin, kieselsol, labels | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Vineco International Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Vineco International Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Vineco International Products Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named LEGACY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2006 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |