Drawing for LEGACY

USPTO serial 78188895

LEGACY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3102896Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 13, 2006
Examiner
GENOVESE, CARRIE A
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LEGACY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOSEPH H. GOLANT

JOSEPH H GOLANT JONES DAY77 W WACKER STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601-1692UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wine making kits consisting primarily of fruit juice or fruit juice concentrates and chemical additives, and which may contain sulphur dioxide, liquid invert sugar, diammonium phosphate, citric acid, malic acid, tartaric acid, bentonite, potassium sorbate, yeast, potassium metabisulphite, oak extract, oak chips, herbs, elderflowers, elderberries, tannin, sodium benzoate, glucose, isinglass, chitosan, gelatin, kieselsol, labelsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 21, 2006C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 3, 2006C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Oct 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 29, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Dec 28, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 23, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 23, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 22, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 21, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 26, 2004GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 26, 2004CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance