USPTO serial 78189144
INTELLICHEF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTELLICHEF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Chester, PA
West Chester, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MANNY POKOTILOW
MANNY POKOTILOW CAESAR, RIVISE,BERNSTEIN,COHEN & POKOTIL12TH FL SEVEN PENN CTR 1635 MARKETPHILADELPHIA PA, 19103 2212U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | KITCHEN PRODUCTS, NAMELY JUICE MACHINES, ELECTRICAL PASTA MAKERS FOR DOMESTIC USE AND ELECTRICAL FOOD PROCESSORS, ELECTRIC MIXERS, ELECTRIC BLENDERS, ELECTRIC HAND MIXERS, ELECTRIC STAND MIXERS, ELECTRIC ICE CRUSHERS, ELECTRIC ICE CREAM MACHINES, ELECTRIC ICE SHAVERS, ELECTRIC FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PEELERS, ELECTRIC CAN OPENERS AND VACUUM SEALERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | ELECTRIC COOKWARE, NAMELY, ELECTRICAL SKILLETS, ELECTRIC ROTISSERIES, BREAD MACHINES, ELECTRIC DEEP FRYERS, ELECTRIC PRESSURE COOKERS, BARBEQUE GRILLS, ELECTRIC TOASTERS, ELECTRIC TOASTER OVENS, ELECTRIC COFFEE MAKERS, ELECTRIC SLOW-COOK CASSEROLES, ELECTRIC WOKS, ELECTRIC FRYING PANS, ELECTRIC GRILLS, ELECTRIC GRIDDLES, OUTDOOR ELECTRIC GRILLS, SMOKELESS BARBEQUE GRILLS, CONVECTION OVENS FOR DOMESTIC USE, MICROWAVE OVENS FOR COOKING, ELECTRIC WAFFLE IRONS, ROASTER OVENS, ELECTRIC RICE COOKERS AND ELECTRIC FOOD STEAMERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |