Drawing for * MTV MUSIC TELEVISION

USPTO serial 78189409

* MTV MUSIC TELEVISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ENGEL, MICHAEL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with * MTV MUSIC TELEVISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph Molko

JOSEPH MOLKO C/O A ARIES TABIGUE1515 BROADWAY, 51STVIACOM INTERNATIONAL INCNEW YORK NY, 10036U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable ring tones, music, mp3s, graphic, games, and video images for wireless mobile communication devicesACTIVE—
035Arranging and conducting polling and voting services for others via a wireless communication networkACTIVE—
038Providing wireless transmission of uploading and downloading ring tones, voice, music, mp3s, graphics, games, video images, information, and news via a global computer network to a wireless mobile communication device; sending and receiving voice and text messages between wireless mobile communication devices; Providing voting and polling via a wireless mobile communication deviceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 14, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 17, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 10, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 19, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 29, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 23, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 12, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance