USPTO serial 78189920
PDQ!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PDQ!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | CUTTING OIL FOR INDUSTRIAL METAL WORKING; ALL PURPOSE PENETRATING OIL; FUEL OIL; INDUSTRIAL OIL FOR BATTERIES; MOTOR OIL; NON-CHEMICAL MOTOR OIL ADDITIVES; OIL FOR USE IN THE PRESERVATION OF MASONRY; LUBRICATION GREASE FOR VEHICLES; PETROLEUM BASED DUST ABSORBING COMPOSITIONS FOR USE IN ROAD BUILDING, SWEEP, DUSTLAYING; PETROLEUM JELLY FOR INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES; GREASE FOR MACHINES; FUEL FOR AIRCRAFT/SHIPS; FUEL FOR MOTOR VEHICLES, NAMELY GASOLINE; FUEL FOR MOTOR VEHICLES, NAMELY DIESEL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |