USPTO serial 78189922
FARMSMART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FARMSMART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bangkapi, Huaykwang, Bangkok, TH
Bangkapi, Huaykwang, Bangkok, TH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard R Alaniz
RICHARD R ALANIZ BLACK LOWE & GRAHAM PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in business applications, namely, for tracking the identification and source-related information of consumer and wholesaler products provided by farmers, manufacturers, distributors, exporters, packhouses, exporters, importers, logistic suppliers, warehousers, and retailers through all stages of the supply chain. | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 16, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |