USPTO serial 78190541
PRAISING HIM DAILY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PRAISING HIM DAILY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Hair styling and beauty salon services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2006 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jan 22, 2006 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 17, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |