USPTO serial 78191250
TABLET TV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TABLET TV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fountain Valley, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marvin H. Kleinberg
MARVIN H KLEINBERG KLEINBERG & LERNER, LLP2049 CENTURY PARK E STE 1080LOS ANGELES CA, 90067U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELEVISIONS, LCD TELEVISIONS, PLASMA TELEVISIONS, VIDEO MONITORS AND DVD PLAYERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 5, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |