Drawing for CASA NUEVA

USPTO serial 78191432

CASA NUEVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CASA NUEVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030CORN TORTILLAS, FLOUR TORTILLAS, TACO SHELLS, AND TORTILLA CHIPSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 4, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 26, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Dec 27, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2005MAB7ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Oct 4, 2005ABN7ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT—
Mar 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 8, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 30, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 30, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2004SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 21, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 14, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 29, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 9, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 17, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance