Drawing for TYROD

USPTO serial 78191565

TYROD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - REVIEW AND AMENDMENT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TYROD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott W. Kelley

SCOTT W KELLEY KELLY BAUERSFELD LOWRY & KELLEY, LLP6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS CA, 91367U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007MACHINE PARTS, NAMELY, HYDRAULIC CYLINDERSACTIVENov 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Jan 17, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 17, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 8, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 12, 2004IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 20, 2004AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 12, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2004IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 10, 2003GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 25, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2003PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance