Drawing for TWIN LOOP

USPTO serial 78191892

TWIN LOOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALTREE, NICHOLAS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TWIN LOOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul D. McGrady,

PAUL D. MCGRADY, LADAS & PARRY224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1200CHICAGO IL, 60604U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal binding elements, namely, metal binding wireACTIVE—
007Machines, both electric and manual, for use in cutting, punching and binding articles of paper and cardboard, laminating machines, collating machines, paper jogging machines, and parts thereofACTIVE—
016Documents binding wire; plastic index dividers; paper covers for reports and other documents; protective cover for sheets of paper and pages of books and the like; and plastic bindings including coils and combsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance