Drawing for POWERED BY PURE SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78191895

POWERED BY PURE SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERED BY PURE SPECTRUM TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fred W. Hathaway

FRED W HATHAWAY BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS LLPPO BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Licensing of lighting technologyACTIVE—
042Provision of lighting technology, namely, the designing and engineering of lights, lighting systems, ballasts and ballasting systems and components for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Jul 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 22, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 30, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 14, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 10, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 15, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
May 15, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 23, 2002AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance