USPTO serial 78192024
BAG A BARGAIN!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BAG A BARGAIN!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
WICHITA, KS
WICHITA, KS
WICHITA, NV
WICHITA, NV
WICHITA, KS
Trustees of America's Drive-In Trust, The
Reno, NV
Other trademarks owned by Trustees of America's Drive-In Trust, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Phillip L. Free, Jr.
PHILLIP L FREE JR CROWE & DUNLEVY PC20 N BROADWAY STE 1800OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102-8273UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | COMBINATION MEAL CONSISTING OF A SANDWICH, FRENCH FRIES AND A SOFT DRINK, FOR CONSUMPTION ON OR OFF THE PREMISES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICA'S DRIVE-IN CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICA'S DRIVE-IN CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICA'S DRIVE-IN CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICA'S DRIVE-IN CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AMERICA'S DRIVE-IN CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by Trustees of America's Drive-In Trust, The
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BAG A BARGAIN!
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 6, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 30, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 22, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |