USPTO serial 78192915
IMOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
STAMFORD, CT
Woodland Hills, CA
Woodland Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anne Wang
ANNE WANG CHRISTIE, PARKER & HALE LLP350 W COLORADO BLVD STE 500PASADENA CA, 91105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | AIRCRAFT SEAT POSITIONING ACTUATION DEVICES, NAMELY, SEATBACK ELECTRICAL ACTUATORS, FOOTREST ELECTRICAL RECLINE ACTUATORS, SEATPAN RECLINE ELECTRICAL ACTUATORS, LEGREST ELECTRICAL ACTUATORS, HEADREST ELECTRICAL ACTUATORS, MOVEABLE LUMBAR ELECTRICAL ACTUATORS, ELECTRICAL CONTROL DEVICES, NAMELY, JUNCTION BOXES, PASSENGER CONTROL UNITS (PCUS), POWER SUPPLY/SOFTWARE CONTROLLERS, PNEUMATIC LUMBAR CONTROLLERS, ELECTRICAL WIRING, AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, LUMBAR BLADDERS AND MECHANICAL RELEASE CABLES, ALL SOLD AS A UNIT | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX5M | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX5D | SOU EXTENSION 5 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 4, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 4, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |