Drawing for ELITE PHYSIQUES

USPTO serial 78193143

ELITE PHYSIQUES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3226633Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 10, 2007
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ELITE PHYSIQUES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Health club services, namely providing instruction and equipment in the field of physical exerciseSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDDec 15, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Apr 10, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 23, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 3, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 6, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 14, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2006FAXXFAX SENT—
Oct 26, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 29, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 3, 2006PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Jul 3, 2006PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Mar 8, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2005GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
May 11, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 11, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 25, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 27, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 27, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 13, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance