USPTO serial 78193396
ATG AVIATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. PERFORMANCE AT A HIGHER LEVEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATG AVIATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. PERFORMANCE AT A HIGHER LEVEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert B. Schultz
ROBERT B SCHULTZ AVIATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP INC8001 S INTERPORT BLVD STE 310ENGLEWOOD CO, 80112U.S. ARMYGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Simulators for training pilots | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Dec 5, 2002 |
| 012 | Aircraft; jet aircraft, military manned and unmanned combat aircraft, civilian and military jet trainers and business and recreational jets | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2002 |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, aircraft pilot training services | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Dec 5, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Aviation Technology Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ATG AVIATION TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC. PERFORMANCE AT A HIGHER LEVEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |