USPTO serial 78193648
SKIN DEEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKIN DEEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South Pasadena, CA
South Pasadena, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brandon Tesser
BRANDON TESSER TESSER & RUTTENBERG12100 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 220LOS ANGELES, CA 90025UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | clearing houses for radio and television programs; production and distribution of radio and television commercials; radio and television clearing houses; promoting the goods and services of others through informercials played on customer point of purchase television monitors in retail stores; providing home shopping services in the field of medicine by means of television; providing television advertising for others; retail store services available through computer communications and interactive television featuring medicine; retail television stores; telephone and television auctions; television advertising agencies, | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 1, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 11, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |