Drawing for USF

USPTO serial 78193899

USF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with USF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Anton J. Hopen

ANTON J HOPEN SMITH & HOPEN, PA15950 BAY VIS DR STE 220CLEARWATER FL, 33760U.S. ARMY

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, providing courses of instruction for others at the University levelACTIVESep 1, 1960

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 4, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 4, 2005EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 5, 2004GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 5, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 4, 2004GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 16, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 11, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance