USPTO serial 78193965
CLEARNORUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLEARNORUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David N. Zeidner
BRYAN G PRATT RADER, FISHMAN & GRAUER PLLC10653 S RIVER FRONT PKWY STE 150SOUTH JORDAN, UT 84095UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | CONTACT LENS CARE PREPARATIONS IN SOLUTION AND TABLET FORM FOR DISINFECTING, CLEANING, WETTING, CUSHIONING, SOAKING, OR RINSING CONTACT LENSES; LIQUID SOLUTIONS WHICH REWET, LUBRICATE, REHYDRATE OR RELIEVE DRYNESS IN THE EYES OR CONTACT LENSES; ARTIFICIAL TEARS; OCULAR DECONGESTANTS; AND OCULAR OINTMENTS WHICH RELIEVE IRRITATIONS, RELIEVE REDNESS, RELIEVE DISCOMFORT OR SOOTHES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |