USPTO serial 78194015
ISOSYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3009325Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- IM, JEAN H
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ISOSYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia J. Ledgley
Cynthia Ledgley LEDGLEY LAW724 ANNETTE STREETTORONTO, ONTARIO, M6S2E2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for integrated automation of workplace quality management control systems, workplace environmental and waste management control systems, and workplace health and safety management control systems supporting compliance with international standards including ISO 9000, ISO 14000, OHSAS 18000, QS 9000, and ISO TS 16949; namely-- Computer software modules for use in document management, including searching and sorting documents, protected viewing of documents, controlling distribution of document copies; automated revision; keeping a full history of all document revisions, computer software for use in automation of smart forms; Computer software modules for workplace procedures nonconformance tracking and compliance, including tracking improvements, tracking customer complaints, analysis tools to determine cause and effect for nonconformance; Computer software modules for use in instrument calibration procedures, namely keeping records of instruments, controlling calibration procedures including calibration frequency and validity, calculation of measurement uncertainties, keeping a full history of all instruments; Computer software modules for workplace Human Resources management namely, monitoring tasks associated with job functions, assigning employees to jobs based on abilities for job functions, keeping a history of each employee, keeping records of courses and instructors, verifying training effectiveness, costing budgeted and actual training time by department and employee, Computer Software modules for workplace project management, including planned and actual charts including Gantt charts ; Computer software modules for use in workplace inspection, internal and external audits; Computer software modules for use in controlling quality assurance in workplace maintenance, including managing work orders by time, cost and quality, scheduling preventive maintenance; displaying maintenance calendars, keeping track of equipment usage history, monitoring parts inventory and parts consumption, alerting to work overload, alerting to overdue work orders, analyzing defects and failure causes; analyzing systems or equipment failure modes and the resulting effects in a workplace; Computer software modules for use in documenting and mapping manufacturing and workplace processes including generating visual flowcharts for analysis, evaluating process and activity cost and time, optimizing flow of materials and information, viewing resource allocation across processes, keeping a history of all process revisions, keeping a record of all process documents; Computer software modules for use in management of workplace key performance indicators, including publishing and communicating results to users, analyzing performance problems, root cause analysis and generating action plans; Computer software modules for use in workplace workflow automation; Computer software modules for use in workplace communication management and customer service management, including automating policy objectives and targets, setting policy, tracking progress with planned and actual Gantt charts, measuring and monitoring and analyzing performance of significant business aspects, keeping a history of workplace accidents and incidents, tracking workplace legal and regulatory requirements; Computer software modules for managing workplace management level employees and executives, including managing intranets and other web-based systems for selected groups of users and decisions makers in a workplace; and Computer software modules for use in workplace hazard analysis and critical control point management | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 24, 2009 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 17, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |