USPTO serial 78194367
DETROIT HOME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 6, 2004
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DETROIT HOME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Geoffrey D. Aurini
GEOFFREY D AURINI HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLCPO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD, MI 48303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | magazines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 17, 2006 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |