USPTO serial 78194410
CULINART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CULINART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Parham Zar, Esq.
PARHAM ZAR ESQ10940 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 2150LOS ANGELES, CA 90024-3942UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Flatware, namely forks, knives and spoons; kitchen knives; cutlery, namely knives, forks and spoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cookware, namely stockpots, frying pans, roasting pans, metal cooking pots and pans, cooking pots, rice cookers, rice steamers, steamer baskets, non-electric kettles, tea kettles, bowls; household utensiles, namely colanders, strainers, stapulas, pot and pan scrapers; and serving dishes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |