USPTO serial 78194520
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HERBERT H. FINN
HERBERT H FINN GREENBERG TRAURIG, PC77 W WACKER DR STE 2500CHICAGO IL, 60601U.S. ARMY| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Soaps, namely hand soaps, perfumed soaps and moisturizing soaps; fragrances, namely perfumes, eaux de cologne, eaux de toilette, and mineral water sprays; shaving and after-shave products, namely after-shave lotions, after-shave balms, after-shave moisturizers, shaving foams; non-medicated hand and foot preparations for moisturizing, cleansing, comforting, relaxing, massaging and improving the appearance of hands and feet, namely disposable pre-moistened hand wipes, hand and foot gels, hand and foot creams, hand and foot oils, hand and foot milks, hand and foot balms, and hand and foot lotions; essential oils for personal use, namely bath essences, perfumed oils, aromatherapy oils, aromatic creams, gels and sticks, and non-medicated bath salts, and powdered bath salts; hair care preparations and treatments for moisturizing, repairing, fortifying voluminizing, protecting, coloring, fixing and styling hair, namely shampoos, conditioning treatments, hair lotions, hair sprays, hair bleach, hair mousses, hair gels, hair creams, hair masks, hair tints; oral hygiene products, namely toothpaste and non-medicated mouthwash or rinse; non-medicated skin care preparations and treatments for moisturizing, cleansing, vitalizing, purifying and improving the appearance of the body and face, namely creams, lotions, milks, toners, gels, emulsions, foams, masks, fluids, scrubs and patches; non-medicated anti-wrinkle, anti-blemish and anti-aging preparations and wrinkle reducers; creams, lotions, fluids, gels, and patches for cellulite reduction; moisturized cosmetic wipes, refreshing non-medicated cleansing wipes; make-up products, namely creams and lotions for the face, foundations, eye smoothing bases, enhanced tinted moisturizer, face powders, blushers, eyeliners, eyeshadows, mascara, lipsticks, kohl pencils, powder compact, eye contouring pencils, lip contouring pencils, lip glosses, non-medicated lip defenders and repairers; concealer sticks; nail polishes and removers; facial cleansers; make-up bases; nail softeners, nourishers and strengthener; perfumed deodorants for personal use, namely spray deodorants, cream deodorants, roll-on anti-perspirant; non-medicated bath and shower products, namely bath salts, bath crystals, bath powders, bath oils, bath milks, bath gels, bath essences, bath additives and shower gel; non-medicated face and body sun care bronzing and protection products, namely sun tanning preparations, sun sprays, sun milks, sun balms, sun creams, sun sticks, sun oils, sun anti-wrinkle creams, lotions and sprays, aftersun wipes, soothing aftersun products, namely creams, lotions, sprays, balm and gels; massage oils and creams; and room fragrances, namely perfumed room strays, fragrance emitting wicks, scented ceramic stones, incenses, aromatic wood chips, aromatic potpourris; and scented products for use with linen and lingerie, namely sachets and scented water for use in irons | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 30, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 31, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |