Drawing for SMARTNET

USPTO serial 78194814

SMARTNET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SMARTNET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT H. FINN

WILLIAM E MARAMES ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5399UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Door access control systems namely, access control systems comprised of magnetic encoded card readers, electronically operated locks, alarms, and magnetic encoded identification cards for use in buildings and other secure environments; computers, electronic data processors, and control units comprised of microprocessors, for controlling electronically operated locks and doors in access control systems; network access control systems comprised of electronically operated locks and magnetic encoded identification card readers connected to a computer network; computer tokens, namely, magnetic encoded electronic identification tags to be read by access control units to permit access through doors; token reading apparatus, namely, magnetic encoded identification tag readers and electronically operated locks; blank magnetic data carriers; pre-recorded magnetic data carriers featuring personnel identification information for use in access control systems; computer software for managing access to buildings and security systems control systemsACTIVE—
037Installation, maintenance and repair of computers, computer systems, microprocessor based control apparatus, token reading apparatus, electronic access control systems and electronic authorization systemsACTIVE—
041educational services, namely, providing workshops, seminars, classes, and training programs in the fields of electronic access control and authorization systems, computer systems, security systems and alarm systemsACTIVE—
042consulting and computer design services in the fields of computers and computer hardware; consulting services in the fields of computer-controlled electronic access control and authorization systems, security systems and alarm systems; computer systems analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 1, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 5, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 5, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 18, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 25, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 24, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 24, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 4, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 29, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance